Martial arts were never meant to be safe, convenient, or purely recreational. They were born from violence, refined by necessity, and preserved because they worked. Somewhere along the way, many practitioners forgot that.

When martial arts schools began appearing across the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, the message was clear and unambiguous: this is for self-defense. Advertisements didn’t hide behind euphemisms. Schools promised protection, survival, and real-world effectiveness. Some openly used phrases like street defense or street fighting—language that would be considered unacceptable in many modern academies.

Circa 1970's Count Dante the contreversial figure who branded himself as the deadliest man in the world professing to teach the "deady secrets of self defense"

That era was shaped by postwar realism and cultural disruption. Figures like Bruce Lee famously rejected “organized despair” and tradition for tradition’s sake. His message wasn’t subtle: if your art doesn’t work under pressure, it doesn’t work—period. That philosophy didn’t just influence Jeet Kune Do; it laid intellectual groundwork for modern MMA and contemporary combatives.

Early Bruce Lee training for Black Belt Magazine's article on his philosophy, which he challenged the world to "liberate themselves from classical karate"

Fast forward to the 1980s. Martial arts exploded commercially. Schools grew larger. Children’s programs multiplied. Belt systems expanded. With that growth came a shift in language and intent. Self-defense quietly moved to the background, replaced by a more marketable phrase: life skills.

Respect. Discipline. Confidence. Focus.

All valuable traits—but traits that were once byproducts of learning how to fight, not substitutes for it.

Today, some instructors openly admit that self-defense is one of the least emphasized aspects of their curriculum. In certain systems, it has been almost entirely removed. Olympic-style Taekwondo—descended from the efforts of Choi Hong-hi—has become a highly specialized sport with little connection to civilian violence.

Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, once promoted by Hélio Gracie as a method for smaller individuals to survive real fights, now the art and its new generation splits cleanly between competition academies and self-defense-focused schools.

None of this is accidental.

Drawing on documented interviews, including his 2002 conversation with Black Belt Magazine, Hélio Gracie made his position clear: true proficiency in a martial art could only be proven through direct testing against other fighting systems.

For Gracie, theory, tradition, and cooperative training were never enough. An art had to be pressure-tested against resisting opponents from different disciplines to reveal its strengths and expose its weaknesses.

By openly challenging boxers, wrestlers, judoka, and practitioners of other styles—and encouraging his students to do the same—Gracie demonstrated that Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu was not merely conceptual or stylistic, but functional under real resistance. In doing so, he didn’t just validate his own system; he helped redefine how the martial arts world measures effectiveness.

History suggests he didn’t just believe this philosophy—he proved it.

So today, imagine a student—or an instructor—openly challenging another school to test their style. In the highly litigious world we now inhabit, that idea would likely be shut down before the conversation even began. Liability waivers, insurance policies, and legal counsel have replaced the informal challenge matches that once shaped reputations and refined technique.

Yet the disappearance of those challenges raises an uncomfortable question.

If styles are no longer tested against one another, how do we now define effectiveness?

More importantly, has self-defense—once the non-negotiable foundation of martial arts—quietly slipped down the list of priorities?

That question doesn’t have an easy answer, but it deserves an honest discussion.

So let’s be direct—and deliberately provocative and count down the Top 10 Reasons People Practice Martial Arts Today, starting with the least controversial and ending with the one we’ve arguably softened the most.

10. For the Love of the Art

Some people train simply because they love training. No justification required. Historically, this mirrors older warrior cultures where martial practice was inseparable from identity. You didn’t ask why—you trained because that’s who you were.

9. Self-Discipline

Discipline was once forged through physical hardship, not motivational slogans. Fighters like Mas Oyama didn’t talk about discipline—they embodied it. Discipline wasn’t taught; it was survived.

8. Self-Confidence

Confidence used to come from capability. Today, it often comes from reassurance. The uncomfortable truth is that confidence built without pressure testing is fragile—and history shows that martial confidence was never meant to be theoretical.

7. Community

Martial arts have always created tribes. Dojos, gyms, and schools form bonds that keep people training long after motivation fades. Community is powerful—but it was never the primary purpose of training. It was the glue, not the foundation.

6. Mental Fitness

Long before mindfulness apps, martial arts emphasized mental clarity. Jigoro Kano promoted judo as a means of cultivating character and intellect. But mental refinement was inseparable from physical struggle—not a replacement for it.

5. Legacy

Martial arts were traditionally inherited, not sampled. Family lines and teacher-student lineages preserved knowledge through responsibility, not convenience. Today, legacy still draws people in—but it sometimes keeps systems frozen rather than functional.

4. Competition

Competition didn’t create martial arts—but it reshaped them. Modern rule sets reward specialization, athleticism, and optimization. That’s not inherently wrong. But sport training answers a different question than self-defense ever did.

3. Cultural Preservation

Some arts survive as living museums—preserving language, rituals, and traditions. This matters. But history is clear: culture was preserved because the art worked, not despite it. When function disappears, culture eventually follows.

2. Physical Fitness

Martial artists were never “getting in shape”—they were preparing for violence. Today, martial arts offer longevity, mobility, and conditioning in a way few activities can. Fitness is a powerful benefit—but it was never the original goal.

1. Self-Defense

This is the uncomfortable one.

The word martial comes from Mars—the god of war. Martial arts were created for conflict, survival, and domination under pressure. Military and law enforcement units still train in combative systems today—though most now favor adaptive, mixed-method approaches rooted in wrestling, boxing, jiu-jitsu, and Muay Thai rather than rigid tradition.

And yet, in many modern schools, self-defense is optional. Minimized. Sanitized.

The irony is impossible to ignore: the reason martial arts exist is now often the reason least discussed.

The Real Question

Martial arts didn’t lose their way.

They adapted—to economics, to parents, to sport, to safety, to culture.

But adaptation always comes with trade-offs.

So the real question isn’t what should martial arts be.

It’s this: If self-defense disappeared entirely from your training, would anything essential actually be missing?

Your answer tells you exactly why you train.

Subscribe to Black Belt +

Sign Up for Newsletter